GFY psychopath.
Your "logic" seems to be that if someone else makes more, it's okay to steal from them if you believe you're underprivileged. Since most people are too weak and/or scared to steal, they get someone else to do it for them. Trouble is, it's still immoral to get someone else to steal for you, even if you believe you're somehow entitled to someone else's stuff.
Totally, painfully wrong.
Actually, he's completely and provably quite correct. Your response didn't even make any sense beyond this first, completely ridiculous denial. Whatever point you were trying to make about alternative fuels is lost in your lack of writing ability and poor communication skills. Fossil fuels are factually 96% of what powers transportation globally. Aviation and shipping are close to 100%. Even with cheap nuclear power, creating synfuels has major problems and still would result in more expensive fuels. The technology isn't there yet to make synfuels viable cost-wise, the are not, as you say, commercially viable. If they were they'd already be widespread and popular. Given that right now any synfuel production is likely the result of a government funded study or subsidy, you might want to get your facts straight.
Really strange that people have to ask permission for those when in the USA
Guess you haven't been to the USA. Guns, drugs, prostitution: are all allowed in various degrees. Some areas are more restricted and Norwegian-like than others (ie.. Commiefornia). However, if you even try to spark a jay in Norway, you're going to jail quick there Mr. Freedom. Hell if you even have bud you're a criminal in Norway. Great "liberalism" on display there, pal.
Norway is more permissive than the USA wrt real freedom
Where are they more permissive exactly ? Ah, is this the "Freedom to censor your neighbor", "Freedom to control other people's movement", or "Freedom to fuck up your neighbors kids education?" which one is it that you are referring to? Not that they didn't do that exact shit right here in the USA, too, but you just said "real freedom" and made it a contrast; so prove it!
Do I really want to send my kids to a school where yours is taking his AR15 to class today because he got turned down by a girl?
No, you apparently would want to send them to a liberal political retreat on Utøya island to get shot and blown up by native son Anders Brevik, who walked through your gun restrictions like they were made outta snow, then you'd have your authorities run around like Keystone Cops unable to even find guns to fight back for 65 minutes while they cowered and sank overloaded boats (thought you guys liked boats and understood them) trying to get to the island. All this in the deadliest mass shooting by a single gunman in peacetime. Looks like all those restrictions failed and you don't exactly have the moral high ground for SHIT.
But the language you choose is the tell for where you fall on the spectrum.
I made statements you could either try to refute or agree with. Instead you're gonna whine like a bitch and check out because someone used a phrase you don't like? Oh, you poor thing! That sounds a lot like the kind of snooty butthurt censorship we saw during CV19. If you tell me you're Norwegian from Oslo, I'm going to believe you wholeheartedly.
"Submissive to power"? Or just submissive to reason. And science. And civility.
Actually, I'd say just submissive in general. Most Norwegian men are very quiet and submissive in general, just waiting for some woman to tell them what's allowed. In my experience (mostly in Southern Norway around Moss) it's just a cultural norm. Norwegian men have to jump through flaming hoops just to buy a hunting rifle, asking permission from a horde of beurocrats. Sounds pretty submissive to me. That's one of a thousand reasons why foreigners in Norway call it "NO way". Whatever it is: drugs, guns, prostitution, cars, smoking anywhere but your home closet, doing business on Sunday, etc... You just can't because some official woman or man-bitch decided you can't.
You make it very clear that rational liberalism is not tolerable.
I guess that totally depends on how someone randomly defines "rational liberalism". Since you fail to do so, it seems you can make whatever claims that you want. Let me ask you, was it "rational liberalism" that caused the Norwegian government to ban overnight stays in cabins "because covid" ? If so, let's hear how "rational" that explanation sounds right now. Was it smart and rational to shut down all the schools even though kids barely suffer much less and have much lower risk of complications from CV19? Does the fact that Norway's own Corona Commission report highlights these poor decisions directly cause you any cognitive dissonance?
Seen on a button at an SF Convention: Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force. 1990-1951.